This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Continuing with the “No Mess” theme of commenting on things that give VCs pause, I thought it would be good to touch on liquidationpreference. Specifically, “too much” liquidationpreference (I will use “LP” for liquidationpreference). It might be. Off to my meeting!
As the investors’ aggregateliquidationpreference (ALP) increases typically the need for a MCOP also increases. The ALP is the total amount of $ that preferred stock holders are owed on a sale of the company under their liquidationpreferences. A few key points to consider: 1.
Tweaking convertible debt so that common stock (instead of preferred stock) is issued for the conversion discount in order to limit liquidationpreference overhang. Convertible debt with a price cap preserves the investor’s “equity&# ownership, but gives the investor extra liquidationpreference.
Many have noted that the aggregate shareholder value created by all of the Unicorns will vastly overshadow the losses from the inevitable failed unicorns. This is because these companies have raised so much capital that the early investor is no longer a substantial portion of the voting rights or the liquidationpreference stack.
Due to aggregateliquidationpreferences that may exceed the acquisition price in an M&A deal, common stock may be rendered worthless. If you can’t figure this out yourself, you should probably build a liquidationpreference spreadsheet to model how liquidationpreferences work depending on M&A transaction value.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content