This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
From the point of view of scientists and engineers in a university lab, too often entrepreneurship in all its VC-driven glory – income statements, balancesheets, business plans, revenue models, 5-year forecasts, etc. And they’ll do this using the business model / customerdevelopment / agile development solution stack.
Teten: For a large corporate, what are the advantages and disadvantages of a dedicated fund (possibly with external investors) vs. a 100% on-balancesheet investor? A lot of venture investing is done on the balancesheet, meaning there is no dedicated fund and investing is done more opportunistically.
It’s a lot easier to get these numbers to look great by outsourcing everything, getting assets off the balancesheet and only investing in things that pay off fast. Filed under: Corporate Innovation , CustomerDevelopment. These metrics make it difficult for a company that wants to invest in long-term innovation.
From the point of view of scientists and engineers in a university lab, too often entrepreneurship in all its VC-driven glory - income statements, balancesheets, business plans, revenue models - seems like another planet. And they'll do this using the business model-customerdevelopment-agile development solution stack.
We just finished the 8 th annual Lean LaunchPad class at Stanford. So in 2011, with support from the Stanford Technology Ventures Program (the entrepreneurship center in the Stanford Engineering School), we created a new capstone entrepreneurship class – the Lean LaunchPad. It’s the same, but different. I-Corps @ NIH ).
These groups are adapting or adopting the practices of startups and accelerators – disruption and innovation rather than direct competition, customerdevelopment versus more product features, agility and speed versus lowest cost. It needs the tools and processes pioneered in Lean Startups. What to Do?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content